Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 31, 2014, 11:34:56 AM
Home Help Login Register      
News: LiveATC.net Flyers Released!  Please click here to download & print a copy and be sure to post at an airport near you!


+  LiveATC Discussion Forums
|-+  Air Traffic Monitoring
| |-+  ARTCC/FIR/TRACON Maps (Moderators: dave, RonR)
| | |-+  Oakland ARTCC (ZOA)
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Oakland ARTCC (ZOA)  (Read 14393 times)
PHL Approach
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 743



« on: March 06, 2007, 01:16:13 PM »

As requested from another thread. ZOA doesn't name their sectors, just number them.


* ZOAhighaltitude1.jpg (213.39 KB, 881x778 - viewed 1189 times.)

* ZOAlowaltitude1.jpg (200.71 KB, 868x767 - viewed 1046 times.)
« Last Edit: March 07, 2007, 01:21:12 PM by PHL Approach » Logged
inigo88
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 62


« Reply #1 on: March 07, 2007, 03:24:41 AM »

Thank you so much! Sector 36 changed their frequency to 119.975 within the last few years and no other maps have reflected this change yet.

I am wondering if you have their SOP and could answer a question for me. I live and fly under Sector(s) 40/41. They have the same lateral dimensions, but are altitude seperated (both low altitude sectors below FL230).  My guess from a lot of scanner listening and talking to the controller has been:

Sector 40 -- 127.80 / 353.50 -- SFC to 5000
Sector 41 -- 125.85 / 323.00 -- 5000 to FL230

I was just wondering if you could confirm at what altitude exactly the sectors are seperated, and wanted to encourage you to add sector 40 to the map.

Thank you very much though, ZOA Low Alt looks a LOT different since Norcal TRACON has grabbed so much of their airspace! Smiley
Logged
PHL Approach
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 743



« Reply #2 on: March 07, 2007, 01:22:50 PM »

40 is 090-FL230
41 is SFC-080

Now updated, I dont know how I missed that.

Logged
Fred Clausen
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 32


« Reply #3 on: March 07, 2007, 10:26:18 PM »

40 is 090-FL230
41 is SFC-080

Now updated, I dont know how I missed that.



You noob  rolleyes

 grin
Logged

Fred Clausen
inigo88
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 62


« Reply #4 on: March 09, 2007, 03:06:31 AM »

He also switched them in his description (40 is the SFC-80 41 is 90-FL230) but got it right on the map... Would you consider sharing the SOP in exchange for our helpful editorial insight?  grin grin grin

Seriously though only kidding man, the ZOA maps look AWESOME and I've really been waiting for something so up to date for a while. It has and will continue to update a lot of subtle questions I've had regarding the facility and its airspace architecture.

On a related note, my friend Stewart Munson (owner of the local pilot shop adjacent to the flightschool I fly from at the Petaluma airport (O69)) and I are planning on putting a discone on the roof and setting up a feed for ZOA Sectors 40 and 41, along with the closest RCAG for Oakland AIFSS and our local airport's CTAF (which would be beneficial for local pilots since the uncontrolled airport has no AWOS/ASOS to obtain wind and thus runway information from). If that got annoying we could possibly incorporate a second scanner down the road to takeover this duty. Just wanted to give the heads up in this thread to gain some interest and let the liveatc staff know we're very interested in getting the feed going.

Thanks again!

Inigo
Logged
PHL Approach
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 743



« Reply #5 on: March 09, 2007, 08:26:16 PM »

You caught me on the freqs. So I reversed the sectors numbers in the my post  tongue Seriously though, I'll try to update it for the final version Sunday.
Logged
start
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 11


« Reply #6 on: March 19, 2007, 07:18:54 AM »

Thank you!
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!