Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
February 08, 2016, 03:12:15 AM
Home Help Login Register      
News: LiveATC.net Flyers Released!  Please click here to download & print a copy and be sure to post at an airport near you!

+  LiveATC Discussion Forums
|-+  Air Traffic Monitoring
| |-+  Aviation Audio Clips (Moderators: dave, RonR)
| | |-+  Importance of Proper Altimeter Setting
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Importance of Proper Altimeter Setting  (Read 19164 times)
Jr. Member
Offline Offline

Posts: 73

« Reply #15 on: January 27, 2008, 11:47:48 AM »

There is an excellent explanation of, and discussion about, altimeter settings at http://www.polestaraviation.com/?p=23 .

Being from the UK it also involves an interesting discussion on a complication that many other countries, such as the USA, don't have to bother with - namely QFE (air pressure at Field Elevation to give a zero altimeter setting at the airfield) which tends to confuse new listeners to UK and Western European ATC. 

To add to the confusion (which you will appreciate after reading the discussion though it has been going on for many years so seems to work for most pilots) consider that there are a number of airfields in the UK (such as Fairford which gets a mention) which are managed by, and primarily used by, the USAF which mainly use QNH quoted in inches whilst the RAF and local civilian fliers land on QFE in millibars!

Then read more fascinating (mainly UK) pilot comments at http://www.pprune.org/forums/archive/index.php/t-39272.html

Now just to really spice it up go on to read the comments at http://www.geocities.com/daneth71/QFE.html .  Not only do the old Soviet Bloc ATCs (who are nowadays very busy with all the Europe - Asia traffic taking the 'shortcut' route through their airspace) use metres for altitude, instead of feet and Flight Levels, they also use local QFE below transition altitude and not QNH.  These figures can be VERY different at higher altitude airports.

Perhaps one day, aviation, which has made the world so small, will be able to standardise these rather important safety related things but don't hold your breath (at any air pressure) waiting for it to happen!
Offline Offline

Posts: 5

« Reply #16 on: January 27, 2008, 02:03:24 PM »

The problem with 62MA was not the altimeter setting.  He is only off by 0.02 (3054 vs 3056) which is a 20 ft difference only.

His encoder might be goofy (I had one that occasionally read 2-300 ft high for controllers despite about 4 attempts to get it adjusted properly) or maybe he just goofed up.
Sr. Member
Offline Offline

Posts: 255

« Reply #17 on: January 29, 2008, 10:59:44 PM »

I'm talking about the people talking on the CTAF/ATC Freqs. not the aircraft.

Ever flown to an airport that has a very common CTAF, one that is shared by two or three other nearby airports?   What happens on a sunny, summer Saturday morning on 122.8 at this airport?  Nothing but heterodynes.   Getting a good SA picture from the radio is pretty much useless.  Yet, there are not a lot of accidents caused by this issue.

How is that scenario different than one person who cannot speak well on the CTAF (let's put aside the scenario of this person on an ATC frequency for this one moment)?   

Yea I understand where you're coming from. But still at least you can understand what the people are saying if they can speak english. So I take it you are a Pilot?

Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!