|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JetScan1
Hero Member
    
Offline
Posts: 556
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2008, 02:46:39 PM » |
|
Thanks the info. So are you saying you can hear the controllers on all the high altitude frequencies listed except 135.600 ? Re: 134.280 and 127.130 Is this exactly how you have the frequencies entered into the scanner ie: .280 and .130 ? Are you aware that with 8.33 KHz spacing the "channel" is not exactly the same as the actual "frequency" that is being used ? Depending on the bandwidth that is set on the receiver it will improve reception if you have the correct "frequency" entered. In this case: "Channel" 134.280 = "frequency" 134.275 MHz "Channel" 127.130 = "frequency" 127.125 MHz ie: enter 134.275 into the scanner and not 134.280, you have this one entered twice on your list. For more info on 8.33 KHZ spacing .... http://www.jeppesen.com/download/briefbull/fra99-f.pdfRe: 135.720 and 135.620 Maybe a typo, but the correct frequency that should be entered in the scanner is 135.725 and 135.625, otherwise they will be slightly off frequency with a tight bandwidth set. DJ
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
newman
Newbie

Offline
Posts: 6
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: July 05, 2008, 12:03:00 PM » |
|
I don't see any DEMANDS in my post....do you? There only Observations and questions, and if you had been listening on the day to shannon you would have heard what i heard Crackling coming through on the feed. As i am a avid listener to ATC now for a while, i am very aware of how its gets to my computer, and i am very appreciative of this service, and the service providers and their undivided attention to its upkeep. I also have donated to this service in the past, and as i am a listener, i am entitled to air my observations, and without listeners this service would be nothing. so don't come to me with your "Teacher like Attitude" this is not high infants, and don't be so up-tight. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|