Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
February 10, 2012, 12:02:34 PM
Home Help Login Register
News: LiveATC.net Flyers Released!  Please click here to download & print a copy and be sure to post at an airport near you!


+  LiveATC Discussion Forums
|-+  ATC Monitoring
| |-+  Listener Forum
| | |-+  Aeroflot A330 Refused Medical Diversion by NY ATC?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Aeroflot A330 Refused Medical Diversion by NY ATC?  (Read 1516 times)
SkyViking
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 45


« on: October 11, 2009, 11:30:34 AM »

Read the following article and find there may be more to it than stated.

http://avherald.com/h?article=4210c8b2&opt=2048

Anyone find any audio clips of the Aeroflot flight talking to NYC or BOS centers?
Logged
sykocus
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 290



« Reply #1 on: October 11, 2009, 11:56:43 AM »

I can answer the question you pose in the subject line. No they weren't denied by NY ATC. A controller's job is to prevent collisions, facilitate the safe and expeditious flow of traffic and issue safety alerts. Deciding who can land where is not their job (beyond when safety is a factor). A controller may be the one to deliver the message, but making the decision is not in the scope of their job.
Logged

Yesterday I couldn't spell air traffic controller. Today I R one.
Pilot3033
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 56


« Reply #2 on: October 11, 2009, 03:58:02 PM »

I've seen this article pop up in a few aviation forums, and I really find that disappointing. It is a very poorly written article with an incredibly sensationalist headline and no real source. The comments range from attacking the US to trying to re-start the cold war with very few actually using reasoning skills.

The US didn't "refuse" the aircraft from landing in the US or at JFK, in all likelihood the decision was made by pilot in command to continue to YYZ after discussing the situation with the company. IIRC, Aeroflot maintains a station at YYZ, and I assume the paperwork and traffic and inconveniences would be lessened by going there as opposed to the always busy, can never find a slot open JFK. Had the situation been more serious (heart attack, some other more urgent medical issue), I guarantee the plane would have landed at the closest reasonable airport.

The confusion likely stems from a translation error (either from language, or exaggeration by an over-extied passenger).
Logged
magic1085
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 13



« Reply #3 on: October 11, 2009, 11:38:48 PM »

I found a short blurb on Bos Centers atlantic feed archive at about 0345Z  on 8 Oct and the pilot was mentioning possible epilepsy, but it was only one sided, you couldn't hear the controller, and he got handed of to an indecipherable (to me) frequency and I didn't hear anything from him around the same time on any of the other ARTCC feeds so I have no idea where he got handed off to...

That is as much as I could find by digging around...

Hope that helps...
Logged

glencar
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 175


« Reply #4 on: October 13, 2009, 10:52:20 AM »

I was "NY ATC" that night & I was told AFL was coming in with a medical emergency & then I was told a half hour later that he'd gone on to Canada instead. I certainly didn't "refuse" him anything.
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!