Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
October 21, 2014, 12:47:59 PM
Home Help Login Register      
News: LiveATC.net Flyers Released!  Please click here to download & print a copy and be sure to post at an airport near you!


+  LiveATC Discussion Forums
|-+  Air Traffic Monitoring
| |-+  Listener Forum (Moderators: dave, RonR)
| | |-+  FEDEX Plane CRASHES at Lubbock, Tx
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: FEDEX Plane CRASHES at Lubbock, Tx  (Read 9043 times)
chefnoel
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 182


« on: January 27, 2009, 09:29:15 AM »

http://www.statesman.com/news/content/gen/ap/TX_Cargo_Plane_Crash.html
Logged
ect76
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 224

EGPH


« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2009, 07:18:38 PM »

 "There is a trail of jet fuel from their impact area, which was in the grass, to where it sits now to the right of the runway north of the terminal."

I wasn't aware there was a jet-variant of the ATR-42  wink

Glad everyone's ok.
Logged
cessna157
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 708



WWW
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2009, 07:46:15 PM »

"There is a trail of jet fuel from their impact area, which was in the grass, to where it sits now to the right of the runway north of the terminal."

I wasn't aware there was a jet-variant of the ATR-42  wink

Glad everyone's ok.

Um........is that a joke?  Or am I just really confused     huh
Logged

CRJ7/CRJ9 F/O, Travel Agent
Chananya Freedman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 417



« Reply #3 on: January 27, 2009, 07:54:43 PM »

You're not the only confused one.
Logged

73's KI6YIL
Chananya Freedman
A new HAM
ect76
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 224

EGPH


« Reply #4 on: January 27, 2009, 08:31:39 PM »

Never mind, I'll go sit in the corner. Still glad everyone's ok though...
« Last Edit: January 27, 2009, 08:34:34 PM by ect76 » Logged
Аэрофлот Jr.
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 270



WWW
« Reply #5 on: January 27, 2009, 08:54:09 PM »

Never mind, I'll go sit in the corner. Still glad everyone's ok though...

It's alright i do that often too  smiley    i'm glad everyones okay too
Logged

sincerely, Rae
cessna157
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 708



WWW
« Reply #6 on: January 27, 2009, 10:52:30 PM »

Never mind, I'll go sit in the corner. Still glad everyone's ok though...

Haha, did somebody have a brain fart?

Don't worry, it'll happen more and more often as you get older
Logged

CRJ7/CRJ9 F/O, Travel Agent
KASWspotter
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 93


« Reply #7 on: January 28, 2009, 08:58:38 PM »

From what I've seen and read they landed short is that correct? Just tryin to get the facts for future speculation. What are the natural factors that could contribute to that? Low level windshear? Plus I dont know if they were doing an ILS or visual approach. This one will be interesting to see what actually happened and caused it. Glad they walked away though.
Logged
KSYR-pjr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1722



« Reply #8 on: January 28, 2009, 09:36:05 PM »

From what I've seen and read they landed short is that correct? Just tryin to get the facts for future speculation. What are the natural factors that could contribute to that? Low level windshear?

I believe the weather at the time was freezing drizzle/freezing fog.  Airframe  icing would be my first suspect.
Logged

Regards, Peter
ATC Feed:  Syracuse (KSYR), NY
atcman23
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 367



« Reply #9 on: January 28, 2009, 09:42:05 PM »

"There is a trail of jet fuel from their impact area, which was in the grass, to where it sits now to the right of the runway north of the terminal."

For the confused:

The ATR-42 is a turboprop aircraft.  It burns Jet-A ("jet fuel") to operate.  Thus, the statement is correct.

Also, according to an NTSB release earlier today, the aircraft was on an ILS approach into the airport.  With the freezing rain being reported, I'm also thinking aircraft icing, but it's way too early to tell, of course.
Logged

Mark Spencer
KSYR-pjr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1722



« Reply #10 on: January 28, 2009, 09:54:52 PM »

The ATR-42 is a turboprop aircraft.

And, wasn't it an American Airlines ATR-42 that crashed outside of Chicago in a holding pattern at 13,000 feet due to ice back in the early '90s, setting off a major advance in the understanding of the perils of airframe icing?

I am too lazy to look up the aircraft type specifically but I recall it being an ATR model.

(not that this has anything to do with the current accident under question other than bring up a discussion point)
Logged

Regards, Peter
ATC Feed:  Syracuse (KSYR), NY
atcman23
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 367



« Reply #11 on: January 29, 2009, 07:24:24 AM »

Yes I believe it was.  I'll see what I can find on the NTSB reports about that.  Heck, there have been a couple of airframe icing accidents since then that involved airlines.  I recall a CRJ in the late 90s near Detroit.
Logged

Mark Spencer
davolijj
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 548


MMAC ARSR OKC


« Reply #12 on: January 29, 2009, 09:32:15 AM »

And, wasn't it an American Airlines ATR-42 that crashed outside of Chicago in a holding pattern at 13,000 feet due to ice back in the early '90s, setting off a major advance in the understanding of the perils of airframe icing?

I am too lazy to look up the aircraft type specifically but I recall it being an ATR model.

(not that this has anything to do with the current accident under question other than bring up a discussion point)

Pretty much...American Eagle actually (EGF).  That accident led to several Airwortiness Directives for the ATR regarding the Deice boots and ailerons.  Also American Eagle phased out their ATRs in that region moving the majority of them to SJU and the remainder to MIA and DFW.

Back in my deicing days in SYR, Continental Express was still flying ATRs into the airport.  On the rare days it wasn't snowing the BTA ATRs would be our only customers.  They'd come in with so much ice on them we'd have to deice the turn flight just to get the inbound ice off the airframe.
Logged

Regards
JD
KSYR-pjr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1722



« Reply #13 on: January 29, 2009, 09:54:14 AM »

Back in my deicing days in SYR, Continental Express was still flying ATRs into the airport.  On the rare days it wasn't snowing the BTA ATRs would be our only customers.  They'd come in with so much ice on them we'd have to deice the turn flight just to get the inbound ice off the airframe.

Interesting information. 

These days Continental's regional carriers use Dash-8s and CRJs to do their dirty work here in SYR.
Logged

Regards, Peter
ATC Feed:  Syracuse (KSYR), NY
cessna157
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 708



WWW
« Reply #14 on: January 29, 2009, 02:50:48 PM »

Yes I believe it was.  I'll see what I can find on the NTSB reports about that.  Heck, there have been a couple of airframe icing accidents since then that involved airlines.  I recall a CRJ in the late 90s near Detroit.

Comair (3272?) EMB-120 Brasilia, CVG-DTW
Logged

CRJ7/CRJ9 F/O, Travel Agent
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!