chefnoel
Full Member
  
Offline
Posts: 174
|
 |
« on: October 22, 2009, 06:32:01 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 22, 2009, 06:34:35 PM by chefnoel »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
laylow
Full Member
  
Offline
Posts: 117
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: October 23, 2009, 08:17:34 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
atcman23
Sr. Member
   
Offline
Posts: 367

|
 |
« Reply #6 on: October 23, 2009, 09:50:06 AM » |
|
"The NTSB reported, that the crew told Air Traffic Control, that they had become distracted and had overflown Minneapolis and now requested to return.
The FAA reported, that according to post flight interviews the crew had engaged in a heated debate over airline policies and lost situational awareness."from: http://avherald.com/h?article=4219f00f&opt=0Hmmm...engaged in a debate so deep that you don't hear radio calls for 80 minutes?  Yeah I agree... something else happened here. You can't be so caught up in a debate that you forget that you're flying an airplane. Also ran across a poorly written AP article on the accident that suggested that they should have had 15 million warning signs that they were approaching the airport. Ok, maybe not that many but they suggested that "cockpit displays, controllers trying repeatedly to reach, the city lights twinkling below" should have alerted them. Besides controllers contacting them (you would think they would hear someone else talking to them), I don't think the "cockpit displays" would have helped much (nothing jumps out and says "APPROACHING MINNEAPOLIS") and looking outside doesn't do much good at 37,000 feet. Besides it was night time and just because Minneapolis may look bright on the ground doesn't mean it does way up in the air. And if it was cloudy all bets are off. Plain and simple the pilots didn't do what they were supposed to do; they don't need 8-10 different things to tell them they are approaching their destination; they just need to pay attention.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Mark Spencer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|