Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 29, 2014, 04:56:23 PM
Home Help Login Register      
News: NEW Follow LiveATC updates on Twitter and Facebook


+  LiveATC Discussion Forums
|-+  Air Traffic Monitoring
| |-+  Listener Forum (Moderators: dave, RonR)
| | |-+  Scanner Question
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Scanner Question  (Read 2311 times)
Aardvark
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


« on: December 27, 2006, 01:29:15 AM »

I haven’t seen many scanner questions lately so now is my time to shine.  wink

I just bought an ICOM A6 Transceiver and was having second thoughts.

I would love to have UHF for milband, but this one is strictly for civil aviation so I only get the Civil air band. It was clearly designed for pilots. While I am in training for my PPL, I would like to have a handheld with milband on it. I don't care much for the transceiver part (although knowing you could turn on airport lights is cool, but illegal  evil).

I was wondering the difference in receiving capability between mine and say a RS Pro-97 (what I am looking at now). Is their a difference in distance you can receive?

As you can tell I am new to all of this, and it is really late at night =)

Thanks for the help in advanced.

-E
Logged
LORm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 122



WWW
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2006, 02:04:40 AM »

The PRO-97 is a very good scanner, but compared to your common Uniden mil-air capable scanner on it is not quite as sensitive as the Uniden. It may affect the distance and clarity of signals you pick up.

Personally, I think Radioshack scanners are much more intuitive, quicker to program, and easier utilizing all of the functions. I prefer the direct tune "VFO" on RS scanners a lot more than having to program in a search - You simply punch in a frequency and you can tune up or down. Programming scanned channels is fast.

If you're up in the sky or at the airport that you're tuning in, I highly doubt you'll notice any difference between any RS or Uniden model. Hook up an external and the gap closes.

Don't forget to factor in the cost. I believe the only currrent model Uniden handheld that recieves mil-airband is the BCD396T = $529.95 at universal-radio.com.
Logged

Unbeliever
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 99


« Reply #2 on: December 28, 2006, 02:42:00 AM »

If you're going for your PPL, having a tranceiver is useful.  You could call for fuel while at the aircraft without having to power up the master switch, or if your electrical dies, you'll have a backup radio with you (if you remembered to charge up).

Although the rubber whip antenna is useless outside the pattern, a lot of aircraft have a way to patch into the aircraft antenna for better range.  And a headset adapter is useful if you don't want to hold the tranceiver to your ear while flying.

--Carlos V.
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!