Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2015, 11:17:28 PM
Home Help Login Register      
News: LiveATC.net Flyers Released!  Please click here to download & print a copy and be sure to post at an airport near you!

+  LiveATC Discussion Forums
|-+  Recent Posts
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10

 on: Today at 08:50:40 PM 
Started by w0x0f - Last post by jermscentral
I'll bite.

As a trainer of both CTI and non-CTI developmentals in the tower environment, I can't say anything good about this article. The implication is that CTI grads are the best and most qualified candidates to become air traffic controllers, which is simply not true. Sure, they've done simulator training and took courses, but what reporters don't understand is that the ability to work live traffic is an ability, not something that can be taught. Think of it like professional athletes. Some people can train their whole lives and play on varsity teams, but they'll never play for the pros because they just don't have the natural talent/ability.

The article says that some students were given the "answers" to the BQ. No one has been told what the correct answers are to that test. It's based on some kind of scientific research that we don't know a whole lot about, and it was recently revised based on how actual controllers responded to the same types of questions. As it is, someone had already taken screenshots of the questions and posted them on StuckMic, so it's nothing new. The BQ doesn't help people get jobs with the FAA; it's merely the first qualifier in the application process. You can still be disqualified at any point based on your application, failing a security/background check, failing the AT-SAT, failing the MMPI (the REAL biographical questionnaire that'll make you want to shoot yourself), or even bombing an interview; then there's washing out at OKC or even failing at your facility.

The ones complaining are the ones that believed these CTI schools when they were told that they were guaranteed a job if they paid lots of money and got a degree in the program, regardless of their abilities upon graduating. "And until last year, the FAA WEB page advised people like Douglas that the CTI program was the way to become an air traffic controller." No, it was listed as one of the ways to become an air traffic controller. The site has contended since (at least) 2008 that the FAA has multiple hiring sources, and they can determine at any time which method of hiring is used. Sure, preference used to be given to CTI grads, but that was when there wasn't a hiring spree where multiple types of candidats were requested. Ask any OG controller how it was as late as the 90s, when they were put through "the screen" in OKC where they were sat in an auditorium and told to look to their right and left; that two of the three of you would wash out before you ever left Oklahoma. With the retirement spree that started due to the post-PATCO hires hitting age 56, the FAA needed lots more candidates than what the CTI program could adequately provide. Off-the-street hiring was brought back (this was not the first time OTS hiring was used), and many people were found to be qualified than just those that went through a CTI school.

In the new off-the-street application process, college degrees and military experience weren't thrown out, as the article states. All work experience and education counts toward hiring. The FAA did multiple job bids, including one for CTO license holders and previous controllers with at least 1 year of experience, and this was simply another bid that also allowed the general public to apply. "CTI advocates say CTI graduates are more likely to achieve certified professional controller (CPC) status." Well, duh, of course a CTI school will say their program is successful.

tl;dr - Kids that paid for a CTI degree were promised by a school that they'd be hired as ATCs if they graduated. The FAA never promised that, and now the entitled kids are wanting to get a class-action lawsuit against the FAA for believing the wrong thing.

 on: Today at 03:05:46 PM 
Started by kc97chief - Last post by kc97chief
Hi fellow aviators. I am retired and living in Palm Desert and follow socal tracon on my Uniden analog receiver. I stay with 126.7 for two way listening or at least I was. I noticed a few weeks back that I was only hearing the controller on 126.7 and I could no longer hear the calling aircraft. Anyone know why the change? Are there any other repeater frequencies that are within the Palm Desert area? Thanks

 on: Today at 03:43:01 AM 
Started by woohookitty - Last post by Fryy
Cockpit footage of the incident with comms. Jeeez..


 on: May 22, 2015, 10:56:14 PM 
Started by bueller - Last post by bueller
Rochester International Airshow is this weekend 5/23 & 5/24 - KROC

The Delivery/Ground feed will have the Airboss and Blue Angels frequencies programmed in for the weekend.  Normal feed will be restored on Monday.  Enjoy!

 on: May 22, 2015, 08:03:31 PM 
Started by w0x0f - Last post by w0x0f
Surprised no one has posted this yet.  This report should shake things up.


 on: May 22, 2015, 04:47:16 PM 
Started by dave - Last post by Parrotboy
By far my favorite feed. Hope to have it back soon.

 on: May 22, 2015, 03:11:51 PM 
Started by 777lrf - Last post by 777lrf
KIAD ground has a lot of static every 3 seconds, and I do not hear the clearance delivery freq, only ground sometimes.

 on: May 22, 2015, 01:00:46 PM 
Started by dave - Last post by tyketto
I'll place this request with Dave.. and see if we can do this.. could you provide the frequencies your talking about..

The only ZLA frequencies that interact directly with L30 airspace are:

134.65 (sector 6 low, Southwest to SoCal),
124.85 (Sector 8 low, Southeast to ZAB),
124.2 (Sector 7 low, Northeast to ZDV/ZLC,) and
124.62 (Sector 16 low/high, Northwest to NorCal).

Everything else doesn't really hand off directly to L30 or receives handoffs from L30.


 on: May 21, 2015, 08:41:31 PM 
Started by echostar - Last post by echostar
Here you go...other traffic and silence removed and audio edited for sound quality as best as I was able


 on: May 21, 2015, 08:38:37 PM 
Started by ENZV - Last post by ENZV

I have the pleasure of providing ENZV Sola Stavanger Airport to Liveatc and would like to share my setup.

Current setup:
  • Base antenna 5/8 airband 118-137MHZ high gain
  • 4,5m mast, roof mounted
  • SDRplay (8 MHz rspi)
  • Windows Pc with SDR#
  • Raspberry pi 2 with RTLSDR-airband
  • Bandpass filter (118-500mhz)
  • Soft66RTL (RTL2832u+R820T custom mod)

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10

Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!