Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 26, 2016, 12:57:21 AM
Home Help Login Register      
News: No coverage in your area? If you are near your local airport contact us to learn about becoming a volunteer

+  LiveATC Discussion Forums
|-+  Recent Posts
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10

 on: August 16, 2016, 03:15:28 PM 
Started by ironspirit - Last post by dave
We are the provider there...the internet is still out at the feed location after a bad storm. No idea on when it will be restored.

 on: August 16, 2016, 03:14:49 PM 
Started by jcl410 - Last post by dave
This issue is now resolved...scanning both those frequencies.

 on: August 16, 2016, 03:03:14 PM 
Started by jcl410 - Last post by dave
Thanks for the report...that is one of my feeds. Will have to get the new freq programmed into a scan.

 on: August 16, 2016, 12:22:46 AM 
Started by Fryy - Last post by Fryy
AAL178 KMCO to KLAX blew two tires on takeoff resulting in abort. Damage to hydraulic lines and gear door as well. No injuries. This one hit close to home, my dad was the captain on this flight. Also, Buzz Aldren in first class  shocked


 on: August 15, 2016, 10:42:35 PM 
Started by oktalist - Last post by oktalist
Toronto: Air Canada Rouge E170 missed their turn from taxiway B onto H and crossed the hold short line runway 23. Air Canada B789 on final approach to runway 23 was instructed to go around.


 on: August 15, 2016, 09:11:39 PM 
Started by jcl410 - Last post by jcl410
Hi -

 For the last 5 days or so, KBWI tower has been using 123.75 instead 119.4. They say it's temporary, but for an unknown length of time.

Is there any way to get the receiver tuned to the new freq? (Maybe leave both freqs up on the same receiver? They should only use one at a time.)



 on: August 15, 2016, 08:03:23 PM 
Started by kjablonski8706 - Last post by kjablonski8706
Thanks for letting me know! I adjusted the volume on the scanner.   Local traffic sounds great but the Houston Approach is a little distorted (the antenna is 20 mi away on the horizon so I don't expect great ground reception).  Would y'all prefer if i remove the approach frequencies from the scanner and only scan local traffic?

 on: August 15, 2016, 07:02:15 PM 
Started by zulupapa - Last post by zulupapa
Ok, thanks for the info.  I'll send you guys an email tomorrow night when it's all set up.  I just need to install a grounding block that is coming in the mail tomorrow before I am ready for a full time connection.   Thanks again.

 on: August 15, 2016, 05:21:41 PM 
Started by zulupapa - Last post by dave
We always try to run both. If one has better reception we generally try to note that by labeling them #1 and #2 - where #1 has the better reception and is more likely to have someone tune in there first. But that label only applies if the channels are identical.

We generally try to do the right thing...and encourage quality feeds. But there are no hard and fast rules.

Redundancy is considered good.

 on: August 15, 2016, 04:40:53 PM 
Started by JohnN - Last post by JohnN
I've been working on moving my computers around and re-running all the coax and ethernet in my house. I've gotten close to the point where it is time for me to move my scanners and the Raspberry Pi that is running my feeds. As a result, the feed will go down in the near future. I think my antenna coax is long enough that I should be able to bring my feeds back online shortly after they go down, but if I have to run a new antenna cable they'll probably be down longer. I'll post again once everything is finalized and the outages are done. The feeds affected are http://www.liveatc.net/search/?icao=kblm and http://www.liveatc.net/search/?icao=kwri

Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10

Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!