Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2014, 08:02:47 AM
Home Help Login Register      
News: NEW Follow LiveATC updates on Twitter and Facebook

+  LiveATC Discussion Forums
|-+  Recent Posts
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10

 on: April 14, 2014, 07:37:45 PM 
Started by StuSEL - Last post by StuSEL
We've been down for a few days now. Typical troubleshooting (ie. a restart) didn't work, so I'll be going to the site to do more extensive testing this week. May have to get a new wireless adapter if I can determine that that's what's causing the downtime.

 on: April 14, 2014, 01:24:58 PM 
Started by dave - Last post by dave
We are making some changes/additions to our Montreal feed stack.  Right now things are in a little bit of a state of flux but the current feeds are here:


(with the exception of Noranda which is not broadcast out of Montreal)

Recent changes:
- now broadcasting all CYUL Tower frequencies
- addition of some ground freqs
- addition of some CZUL (Montreal Center) frequencies which broadcast from (even if only occasionally) the Montreal area.  On this feed we may still have 125.150, which is a CZUL frequency that handles arrivals/departures into CYHU St. Hubert (that frequency is not listed on this feed right now but is still scanning on it for now as we work on things).

Some things we are trying to figure out:

1) Is it Montreal Terminal or Montreal Center that actually handles IFR traffic into and out of CYHU?
2) Should we move 125.150 to the CYUL Approach feed instead?
3) Does anyone have deeper knowledge of the CZUL transmitters/frequencies allegedly in and around CYUL?

What else would be worth scanning?  We might be able to add a receiver for further splitting but not before we understand the use of repeaters around CYUL.  It seems that there is heavy use of such in the area for both CYUL and CZUL. 

See these references for more info:

 on: April 14, 2014, 12:37:01 PM 
Started by Lynch_Christopher - Last post by dave
That is the only one I am aware of in N90.

 on: April 14, 2014, 01:29:11 AM 
Started by Lynch_Christopher - Last post by Lynch_Christopher
Besides the CMRN frequency changes have there been any other changes?

 on: April 13, 2014, 05:59:01 PM 
Started by alexnew2 - Last post by nathan2k1
Well done to all involved, particularly the ATC and the other pilot for keeping it so calm.

 on: April 13, 2014, 11:23:07 AM 
Started by jvnanu - Last post by jvnanu

Van rolled onto active runway at Pearson on March 15th, 2013. According to media ATC told pilot to go around twice, but they continued with landing.

 on: April 13, 2014, 09:26:00 AM 
Started by Lynch_Christopher - Last post by dave
They may have been interference on 127.4 - they actually tried a different frequency in the process as well.

There are changes going on all over the FAA system, all the time.  And they're not always documented quickly.  Especially on a Wikipedia page.

 on: April 13, 2014, 09:22:17 AM 
Started by Lynch_Christopher - Last post by Lynch_Christopher
Thanks for the info. It's been a while since I took a look at the approach plates so just noticed it. Any idea why they switched?

 on: April 13, 2014, 04:34:39 AM 
Started by leiar - Last post by leiar
Yeah. Next to MH370 Wink

 on: April 13, 2014, 02:31:24 AM 
Started by Lynch_Christopher - Last post by dave
That's the new CAMRN sector frequency.  Been that way for a few months.

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 [7] 8 9 10

Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!