Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 28, 2015, 06:17:16 PM
Home Help Login Register      
News: NEW Follow LiveATC updates on Twitter and Facebook

+  LiveATC Discussion Forums
|-+  Recent Posts
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10

 71 
 on: August 12, 2015, 03:32:56 PM 
Started by JTS97Z28 - Last post by Brad G.
Just in case anyone happens upon this thread but doesn't visit the petition linked above...

Quote from: http://r22r44.com/
GOOD NEWS TO REPORT, THIS CONTROLLER HAS NOW RETIRED AND WILL NO LONGER BE CONTROLLING AIRSPACE AT MONTEREY.

We do not know if this petition had anything to do with his retirement but we would like to thank everyone for signing the petition.

Blue Skies and Smooth Landings-

 72 
 on: August 12, 2015, 03:18:00 PM 
Started by JTS97Z28 - Last post by keith
That was tough to listen to.  Pilot files to FAT (Fresno Air Terminal). ATC issues clearance with the full airport name. Pilot reads back "Cleared to Fresno..." and of course ATC has to correct him on his clearance limit. There isn't a VOR there with a conflicting name (unlike LAX, SFO, etc), so it was  a pointless correction.

I get what he's doing regarding making sure that pilots use their callsign, but if you're only working one plane that could possibly be responding to a call, given the context, and the voice matches the one that did use that callsign less than 3 seconds before...it's a little stiff making them use their callsign again where, once again, there is no ambiguity.

Worse still, if you want them to say their callsign, then just come out and say it, "sorry, but I do need the callsigns on each call." Instead, he goes the passive aggressive route, repeating entire sets of instructions (multiple times in some cases) to prove his point, acting as though he has NO idea of who just called, and NO idea what they just said.

Calling for the radio check on SKW, that was just bizarre. Over.

 73 
 on: August 12, 2015, 02:24:33 PM 
Started by AntiAntny - Last post by VictorAtienza94
And are those videos avilable to everyone? I mean Can I have it?

You can watch it. It's on youtube.

Just search for VASAviation channel smiley

 74 
 on: August 12, 2015, 12:56:42 PM 
Started by PRFlyer - Last post by PRFlyer
Lufthansa 457 Super (LAX-FRA) was lined up on Rwy 24L at LAX and was given take-off. LH457 informed tower that they cannot takeoff with a person standing in the cabin. Tower cancelled Takeoff clearance and Dynasty 006, who was on final, was waved off.

 75 
 on: August 12, 2015, 11:31:16 AM 
Started by Flyingnut - Last post by dave
It's probably just intermittent - thanks for the report but there is nothing we can do.

 76 
 on: August 12, 2015, 11:29:49 AM 
Started by Flyingnut - Last post by Flyingnut
The issue of only hearing aircraft and not the tower on the KORD South Tower feed has returned.  It was fine earlier in the morning.

 77 
 on: August 11, 2015, 10:32:14 PM 
Started by AntiAntny - Last post by busy
And are those videos avilable to everyone? I mean Can I have it?

 78 
 on: August 11, 2015, 07:52:13 PM 
Started by cptbrw - Last post by cptbrw
Delta Airlines Flight 8801, a Boeing 757-200, suffered a hydraulic failure while on final approach to KJFK rwy 13L.  They declared an emergency and continued, landing safely.  However, upon landing they were unable to clear the runway which caused some scrambling on ATC's part to deal with other aircraft on approach to the same runway.  Clip is edited for transmissions relative to the emergency with the exception of the period when DAL8801 reports they are unable to exit the runway to the time they switch to ground which is unedited and in real time.  Also, a few of the ground transmissions are missed because the feed is shared by the 2 KJFK ground frequencies.

http://avherald.com/h?article=48aa9bdc&opt=0

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/DAL8801/history/20150809/1500Z/KATL/KJFK

 79 
 on: August 11, 2015, 03:54:45 PM 
Started by Flyingnut - Last post by Flyingnut
Thanks for the update, Dave.  Things are sounding better this afternoon, than this morning.

 80 
 on: August 11, 2015, 03:46:41 PM 
Started by Jonathank - Last post by dave
I am aware of the transmitters in Iqaluit but internet service there is not good at all so I doubt a reliable feed would be feasible.  But you never know.  wink


Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8] 9 10


Login with username, password and session length

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!